Circumcision was the "sign" or physical brand of identification of the human participants (Genesis 17:11). Circumcision was relevant to Abraham's generation. Why it lost it's relevance after Jesus came?
At[b]Matthew 22:30[/b] it is written, "That same day the Sadducee, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. "Teacher," they said, "Moses told us that if a man dies without having children, his brother must marry the widow and have children for him. Now there were seven brothers among us. The first one married and died, and since he had no children, he left his wife to his brother. The same thing happened to the second and third brother, right on down to the seventh. Finally, the woman died. Now then, at the resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were married to her?"Jesus replied, "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.[b]At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage[/b]; they will be like the angels in heaven."Does it mean according to Jesus in Kingdom of heaven none would marry, they would all be in a kind of[b]live in relationship[/b].
hey everyone:)
ok so you have 12,000 to get any "used" car you want, what car would you get?
i know 12,000 isn't that much but its enough to get a good car. i want ether a bmw 3series or a jeep wrangler. which would you choose? what car would you personally want if you had 12000? why?have a nice day;p happy posting!
Lord Jesus Christ was merely crossing the street within the confines of the crosswalk, yet a gentile ran him over with a car. Thankfully, he only suffered facial injuries and has been released from the hospital.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37015837/
You might have seen in almost all the churches The Holy Cross, with Christ nailed on it. Have you seen or keep the holy cross at home, yes you can see at my home, but many hesitate to keep the cross at home, because they feel that keeping the cross at home will bring them sufferings, like how Jesus Christ suffered in his last days. Do you believe in this.
Although this idea might outrage most Christians, actually, the Roman Empire Code of Laws instituted that the victim of crucifiction should allways be nude while on the cross. The intent was to humiliate and embarrass him/her, (and thus his family and supporters), as much as possible because this cowed the public and reduced dissent. Why do you think there is no painting/statue of Jesus portraiting Him nude? Depicting Christ nude without a veil around His hips might be considered a crime and sentenced with a death penalty within some Radical Christian communities. What's your oppinion on this issue?I have to confess that this topic was inspired to me after reading the "Drawing Muhammad" discussion, here on mylot: http://www.mylot.com/w/discussions/2306764.aspx#2_21107061
I know that this topic has been ages old..but just recently i have read a book entitled HIRAM KEY..the writers in this book are free masons..and the stories have been traced back to a person named HIRAM ABIF..it is said that, during the time Christ was born of the Virgin Mary, there are also other myths that were also born to a virgin mother.. like Buddha? this book also tells u about the Nag Hammaddi scrolls or simply the lost scriptures in the bible..this book will simply tells u that Jesus really is a son of man..what do u think?
